z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reflectance confocal microscopy in actinic keratosis—Comparison of efficacy between cryotherapy protocols
Author(s) -
Mota Amanda Nascimento Cavalleiro Macedo,
De Carvalho Nathalie,
Pellacani Giovanni,
Faria Paula Carolina Pessanha,
Melo Daniel Fernandes,
PineiroMaceira Juan Manuel,
Barcaui Carlos Baptista
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
skin research and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.521
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1600-0846
pISSN - 0909-752X
DOI - 10.1111/srt.12889
Subject(s) - cryotherapy , parakeratosis , actinic keratosis , dermatology , medicine , keratosis , epidermis (zoology) , basal cell , pathology , surgery , anatomy
Background Actinic keratosis (AK) incidence is increasing. Due to the risk of progression to squamous cell carcinoma, early detection and treatment are essential. The method stated in the European Consensus is cryotherapy, but there is no standard protocol defined for better results. Objectives To compare two different cryotherapy protocols for AK using reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) as a noninvasive imaging method for evaluation. Methods A self‐controlled clinical trial was proposed to compare the efficacy of cryotherapy in two different application protocols. Grade II AKs in the forearms were submitted to freezing and thawing time of 10 seconds for 1 cycle (group A) or 2 cycles (group B). At baseline and 4 weeks after treatment, the same dermatologists assessed RCM evaluation (thickness of horny layer, parakeratosis, dyskeratosis, atypia in spinous layer, fibrosis, and presence of inflammatory cells in epidermis and dermis). Results We examined 24 AK lesions in each group. Statistical evaluation of the results evidenced superior response after 2 cycles of cryotherapy in parakeratosis and number of inflammatory cells in epidermis. Conclusion Both protocols are effective in clearing clinical AK. Two cycles are not generating more side effects (fibrosis) and could reduce the risk of recurrence (better “clearance” of parakeratosis).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here