Premium
Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems
Author(s) -
elWakil Alice,
Cheneval Francis
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
swiss political science review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.632
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1662-6370
pISSN - 1424-7755
DOI - 10.1111/spsr.12318
Subject(s) - normative , ballot , scope (computer science) , relevance (law) , democracy , variation (astronomy) , political science , law and economics , positive economics , sociology , voting , public relations , law , computer science , economics , politics , physics , astrophysics , programming language
The main aim of this final essay is to draw on the insights gathered in the Debate “Do Referendums Enhance or Threaten Democracy” to inform future normative and empirical discussions about the design of popular vote processes. We first offer some clarifications regarding three of the concerns raised by respondents about our introductory essay. We then propose a systematic classification of the lines of variation along which the design of popular vote processes usually varies. More precisely, we highlight nine lines of variation: trigger, origin of the text, legal basis, scope, trigger requirements, time, ballot, information, and decision rule. We conclude by emphasizing the relevance and necessity of debating the formal institutional design of popular vote processes.