Premium
Equality and Postcolonial Claims of Discursive Injury
Author(s) -
Michel Noémi
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
swiss political science review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.632
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1662-6370
pISSN - 1424-7755
DOI - 10.1111/spsr.12053
Subject(s) - sociology , postcolonialism (international relations) , transformative learning , performativity , politics , power (physics) , gender studies , critical race theory , inequality , reading (process) , subject (documents) , race (biology) , critical discourse analysis , epistemology , ideology , law , political science , mathematical analysis , pedagogy , philosophy , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , library science , computer science
In Western Europe, individuals and groups increasingly claim that publicly enunciated denigrating racial discourse inflicts an injury upon them, and inscribe this claim under the rubric of equality. By adopting a method of claim‐centered critical theorizing, I discuss the possibilities and implications of reading “claims of racialized discursive injury” as claims to equality. A review of contemporary political theorists concerned with equality and injurious discourse establishes the democratic relevance of claims of discursive injury. A discussion of Judith Butler's theory of performativity then identifies the properties of the injurable subject and of discourse's power. Finally, I specify how a postcolonial stance enables us to grasp the actualization of discursive injury as it resonates between past colonial inequalities and threats of future exclusion or death. This equality‐focused reading sheds light on the transformative potential of claims of racialized discursive injury for resignifying equality in contexts marked by “race” and postcolonialism.