Premium
Sex Differences in Preadolescents’ Attachment Strategies: Products of Harsh Environments or of Gender Identity?
Author(s) -
Pauletti Rachel E.,
Cooper Patrick J.,
Aults Christopher D.,
Hodges Ernest V. E.,
Perry David G.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
social development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.078
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1467-9507
pISSN - 0961-205X
DOI - 10.1111/sode.12140
Subject(s) - psychology , socialization , ethnically diverse , developmental psychology , biological sex , gender identity , identity (music) , social psychology , ethnic group , sociology , anthropology , physics , acoustics
We evaluated two hypotheses proposed to account for sex differences in preadolescents’ insecure attachment strategies (more avoidant for boys, more preoccupied for girls). The first hypothesis, rooted in life history theory, is that the sex differences develop among children who experience adverse environmental conditions (e.g., harsh parenting). The second hypothesis, grounded in gender self‐socialization theory, is that the sex differences develop among children who identify confidently with their gender collective. Data from an ethnically/racially diverse sample (443 girls, 420 boys; M age = 11.1 years) supported the second hypothesis: Sex differences were evident mainly among children who felt gender‐typical, were content with their gender, or felt pressure to avoid cross‐sex behavior. Further, sex differences were generally smaller rather than larger among children experiencing adverse environments.