z-logo
Premium
Women's self‐defense and sexual assault resistance: The state of the field
Author(s) -
Hollander Jocelyn A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
sociology compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 31
ISSN - 1751-9020
DOI - 10.1111/soc4.12597
Subject(s) - self defense , neglect , sexual assault , resistance (ecology) , psychology , empowerment , affect (linguistics) , sexual violence , social psychology , criminology , training (meteorology) , human factors and ergonomics , poison control , political science , psychiatry , law , medicine , medical emergency , ecology , physics , communication , meteorology , biology
Public attention to sexual assault has increased dramatically over the last decade, spurring questions about how it can be prevented. One approach that has received scant attention is women's self‐defense training (sometimes known as sexual assault resistance training). This neglect is curious because empowerment‐based women's self‐defense (ESD) training is so far the only approach that has produced substantively significant decreases in victimization rates. In this article, I review the research evidence on women's self‐defense training. Does resisting a sexual assault affect the outcome of sexual violence? Does self‐defense training further reduce women's risk of violence? What are the other consequences of self‐defense training? How does self‐defense work for different groups of women—for example, those who have survived prior victimizations? Are the critiques of women's self‐defense training valid? Finally, what do we still need to learn about women's self‐defense? Overall, I argue that this evidence presents a compelling case that women's self‐defense training should be central to any efforts to prevent sexual violence.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here