z-logo
Premium
Subjectivity in Feminist Science and Technology Studies: Implications and Applications for Sociological Research
Author(s) -
Schnabel Landon,
Breitwieser Lindsey,
Hawbaker Amelia
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
sociology compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 31
ISSN - 1751-9020
DOI - 10.1111/soc4.12364
Subject(s) - subjectivity , sociology , expansive , context (archaeology) , sociological theory , epistemology , sentience , social science , environmental ethics , paleontology , philosophy , materials science , compressive strength , composite material , biology
Feminist science and technology studies calls the researcher to reconsider subjectivity in three ways. First, who or what has subjectivity? Second, is subjectivity a property of an individual being with sentience, or is it a more diffuse process? Third, who or what acts in meaningful ways to impact social relations (and are thus worthy of sociological study)? According to feminist STS, the conferral of subjectivity has been nationalized, racialized, and sexualized, and the influence of non‐human life and non‐living matter has been underemphasized. We suggest that sociological research could benefit from a more expansive understanding of subjectivity and a more interactive (or “entangled”) notion of social–material relations. Human relations and action need not just be considered in the context of the human and social but can also be considered in relation to the non‐human and material. To make the implications of feminist STS more concrete, we offer specific applications of feminist STS methodologies across a range of sociological methods and topics.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here