Premium
Gender and the Artist Archetype: Understanding Gender Inequality in Artistic Careers
Author(s) -
Miller Diana L.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
sociology compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 31
ISSN - 1751-9020
DOI - 10.1111/soc4.12350
Subject(s) - archetype , genius , sociology , disadvantaged , ideal (ethics) , subject (documents) , promotion (chess) , gender studies , devaluation , aesthetics , psychology , art , epistemology , political science , literature , developmental psychology , philosophy , politics , library science , computer science , exchange rate , law , economics , macroeconomics
Women artists are systematically disadvantaged across cultural fields. Although some of these disadvantages resemble gender inequalities in non‐artistic work, such as lower pay, underrepresentation, work–family conflict, and symbolic devaluation, others are unique to artistic careers. In this essay, I extend Acker's work on the implicit gendering of the ideal‐typical worker to show how gender implicitly organizes social expectations around artists and artistic work. I highlight themes emerging from past research on gender relations in artistic careers, which suggest that the ideal‐typical artist builds on a masculine model in at least three ways. First, collective understandings of creative genius center a masculine subject. Second, bias in aesthetic evaluations systematically favors men over women. Third, the structure of artistic careers, particularly the need for entrepreneurial labor and self‐promotion, requires artists to engage in behaviors that are more socially acceptable in men than in women.