z-logo
Premium
Happiness Research: A Review of Critiques
Author(s) -
Frawley Ashley
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
sociology compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 31
ISSN - 1751-9020
DOI - 10.1111/soc4.12236
Subject(s) - happiness , criticism , normative , scientism , subjectivity , sociology , discipline , epistemology , maturity (psychological) , social science , field (mathematics) , variety (cybernetics) , environmental ethics , social psychology , psychology , political science , law , philosophy , mathematics , artificial intelligence , computer science , pure mathematics
In the short decades since the introduction of positive psychology instigated broader interdisciplinary research, interest in happiness has been growing in academia, the media and public policy. Numerous critiques of these developments have been forwarded from a variety of theoretical and disciplinary traditions. This article discusses three such criticisms: the culture‐bound and normative character of happiness, ‘bad science’ and scientism, and diminished subjectivity and individualisation. It is argued that criticism, particularly internal criticism, evidences the maturity of the field. However, the depth of some critiques may also indicate that interest in happiness is bound with broader cultural preoccupations and is likely to be superseded.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here