Premium
Effects of physical and cognitive training on gait speed and cognition in older adults: A randomized controlled trial
Author(s) -
Sipilä Sarianna,
Tirkkonen Anna,
Savikangas Tiina,
Hänninen Tuomo,
Laukkanen Pia,
Alen Markku,
Fielding Roger A.,
Kivipelto Miia,
Kulmala Jenni,
Rantanen Taina,
Sihvonen Sanna E.,
Sillanpää Elina,
Stigsdotter Neely Anna,
Törmäkangas Timo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of medicine and science in sports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.575
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1600-0838
pISSN - 0905-7188
DOI - 10.1111/sms.13960
Subject(s) - stroop effect , gait , physical medicine and rehabilitation , balance (ability) , physical therapy , medicine , preferred walking speed , cognition , randomized controlled trial , psychiatry
Gait speed is a measure of health and functioning. Physical and cognitive determinants of gait are amenable to interventions, but best practices remain unclear. We investigated the effects of a 12‐month physical and cognitive training (PTCT) on gait speed, dual‐task cost in gait speed, and executive functions (EFs) compared with physical training (PT) (ISRCTN52388040). Community‐dwelling older adults, who did not meet physical activity recommendations, were recruited ( n = 314). PT included supervised walking/balance (once weekly) and resistance/balance training (once weekly), home exercises (2–3 times weekly), and moderate aerobic activity 150 min/week in bouts of >10 min. PTCT included the PT and computer training (CT) on EFs 15–20 min, 3–4 times weekly. The primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were 6‐min walking distance, dual‐task cost in gait speed, and EF (Stroop and Trail Making B‐A). The trial was completed by 93% of the participants (age 74.5 [SD3.8] years; 60% women). Mean adherence to supervised sessions was 59%–72% in PT and 62%–77% in PTCT. Home exercises and CT were performed on average 1.9 times/week. Weekly minutes spent in aerobic activities were 188 (median 169) in PT and 207 (median 180) in PTCT. No significant interactions were observed for gait speed (PTCT‐PT, 0.02; 95%CI −0.03, 0.08), walking distance (−3.8; −16.9, 9.3) or dual‐task cost (−0.22; −1.74, 1.30). Stroop improvement was greater after PTCT than PT (−6.9; −13.0, −0.8). Complementing physical training with EFs training is not essential for promotion of gait speed. For EF’s, complementing physical training with targeted cognitive training provides additional benefit.