Premium
Integrating high‐intensity interval training into the workplace: The Work‐HIIT pilot RCT
Author(s) -
Eather Narelle,
Babic Mark,
Riley Nicholas,
Harris Nigel,
Jung Mary,
Jeffs Mikeelie,
Barclay Briana,
Lubans David R.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of medicine and science in sports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.575
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1600-0838
pISSN - 0905-7188
DOI - 10.1111/sms.13811
Subject(s) - physical therapy , high intensity interval training , cardiorespiratory fitness , medicine , randomized controlled trial , interval training , aerobic exercise
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention integrated into the workplace on physical and mental health outcomes in a sample of adults. The Work‐HIIT intervention was evaluated at the University of Newcastle (March‐July 2019). University employees (18+ years) who self‐identified as predominantly sedentary at work (n = 47, 43.0 ± 10.7 years; 41 female) were recruited, screened, and randomized after baseline assessments into Work‐HIIT (n = 24) or wait‐list control (n = 23) conditions. Participants were asked to attend 2‐3 researcher‐facilitated HIIT sessions/week (weeks 1‐8). Sessions included a 2‐minute gross‐motor warm‐up, followed by various combinations of aerobic and muscular fitness exercises lasting 8 minutes (using 30:30 second work: rest intervals). Program feasibility was assessed using measures of satisfaction, compliance, adherence, fidelity, and retention. Physiological and psychological outcomes were measured at baseline and 9 weeks. Feasibility data were investigated using descriptive statistics and efficacy outcomes determined using linear mixed models and Cohen's d effect sizes. Participant ratings showed high levels of satisfaction (4.6/5); 71% of participants attended ≥2 sessions/wk and averaged 85.9% HR max across all sessions (including rest and work intervals). Small‐to‐medium positive effects resulted for cardiorespiratory fitness [+2.9 laps, 95% CI (−4.19‐10.14); d = 0.34] and work productivity [+0.26, d = 0.47]. Large positive effects resulted for muscular fitness [push‐ups +3.5, d = 0.95; standing jump +10.1 cm, d = 1.12]; HIIT self‐efficacy [+16.53, d = 1.57]; sleep [weekday +0.76 hours, d = 1.05]; and autonomous motivation [+0.23, d = 0.76]. This study supports the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of facilitator‐led Work‐HIIT as a time‐efficient, enjoyable, and convenient workplace exercise option for adults.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom