Premium
Effects of high‐intensity functional circuit training on motor function and sport motivation in healthy, inactive adults
Author(s) -
Wilke Jan,
Kaiser Stefanie,
Niederer Daniel,
Kalo Kristin,
Engeroff Tobias,
Morath Christian,
Vogt Lutz,
Banzer Winfried
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of medicine and science in sports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.575
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1600-0838
pISSN - 0905-7188
DOI - 10.1111/sms.13313
Subject(s) - circuit training , physical medicine and rehabilitation , functional training , physical therapy , medicine , training (meteorology) , psychology , motor function , intensity (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , meteorology
Purpose A small share of the world's population meets current physical activity guidelines, which recommend regular engagement in endurance, strength, and neuromotor exercise. As lack of time represents a major cause of inactivity, multidimensional training methods with short durations may provide a promising alternative to classical, volume‐oriented approaches focusing on one biomotor ability. This trial examined the effects of a high‐intensity functional circuit training (HIFCT) on motor performance and exercise motivation in untrained adults. Methods Thirty‐three inactive participants were randomly allocated to two groups exercising for six weeks. The intervention group (HIFCT, n = 20) 3 ×/ week performed functional whole‐body exercises in a circuit. Each 15‐minute workout included repetitive 20s all‐out bouts with 10s breaks. In the comparison group (moderate aerobic exercise, MAE, n = 13), the participants walked 3 ×/ week for 50 minutes at moderate intensity. Measured motor outcomes were cycling endurance capacity (respiratory threshold, maximum workload), maximum strength (leg and chest press), postural control (force plate), and jump capacity (counter‐movement jump, single leg hop for distance); exercise motivation was assessed using the self‐concordance index. Results In comparison with MAE, HIFCT enhanced maximum leg strength (between‐group difference of relative pre‐ to post‐changes of 5.0%), shoulder strength (7.6%), and endurance workload (5.0%; P < 0.05), while increasing motivation to exercise (+5.5 points, P < 0.05). No between‐group differences occurred for postural control and jump capacity ( P > 0.05). Conclusion Despite considerably shorter training duration, HIFCT enhances motor function and motivation to exercise more effectively than MAE. Further research should investigate the long‐term adherence to the program and its effectiveness in other settings.