Humankind: A Sick Animal? On the Meaning and Importance of the Primacy of Sexuality in Freud, Fonagy, and Laplanche

In this article, I question the actuality of F reud's ideas on sexuality. First, I investigate why F reud thinks that the main psychopathological syndromes are determined by problems related to sexuality. I then show in what sense F reud's theories on sexuality make it impossible to simply think of psychoanalysis as yet another developmental psychology. Then, I turn to F onagy's recent claim that sexual emotions cannot be mirrored and that this is the reason why sexuality can only be an imposed burden. Or, rather, this impossibility explains why sexuality belongs to the borderline spectrum. F onagy further links this idea to L aplanche's theory of a generalized seduction that it is meant to explain. I argue that it is the other way around: the theory of a generalized seduction explains the lack of mirroring in the case of sexuality. In my conclusion, I state that although the metapsychological claims of both F onagy and Laplanche allow us to reaffirm the special place sexuality has in understanding the human being, their theories fall short when it comes to defending an exclusive primacy of sexuality.