z-logo
Premium
Alternatives to post‐processing posterior predictive p  values
Author(s) -
Gåsemyr Jørund,
Scheel Ida
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.359
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1467-9469
pISSN - 0303-6898
DOI - 10.1111/sjos.12393
Subject(s) - prior probability , posterior probability , mathematics , posterior predictive distribution , measure (data warehouse) , bayesian probability , approximate bayesian computation , test statistic , predictive value , statistic , statistics , algorithm , statistical hypothesis testing , bayesian inference , computer science , bayesian linear regression , artificial intelligence , data mining , medicine , inference
The posterior predictive p  value ( p p p ) was invented as a Bayesian counterpart to classical p  values. The methodology can be applied to discrepancy measures involving both data and parameters and can, hence, be targeted to check for various modeling assumptions. The interpretation can, however, be difficult since the distribution of the p p p  value under modeling assumptions varies substantially between cases. A calibration procedure has been suggested, treating the p p p  value as a test statistic in a prior predictive test. In this paper, we suggest that a prior predictive test may instead be based on the expected posterior discrepancy, which is somewhat simpler, both conceptually and computationally. Since both these methods require the simulation of a large posterior parameter sample for each of an equally large prior predictive data sample, we furthermore suggest to look for ways to match the given discrepancy by a computation‐saving conflict measure. This approach is also based on simulations but only requires sampling from two different distributions representing two contrasting information sources about a model parameter. The conflict measure methodology is also more flexible in that it handles non‐informative priors without difficulty. We compare the different approaches theoretically in some simple models and in a more complex applied example.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here