Premium
Maximum Likelihood Estimators in Regression Models for Error‐prone Group Testing Data
Author(s) -
Huang Xianzheng,
Sarker Warasi Md Shamim
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.359
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1467-9469
pISSN - 0303-6898
DOI - 10.1111/sjos.12282
Subject(s) - covariate , pooling , statistics , inference , group testing , estimator , econometrics , context (archaeology) , mathematics , regression analysis , statistical hypothesis testing , computer science , artificial intelligence , paleontology , combinatorics , biology
Since Dorfman's seminal work on the subject, group testing has been widely adopted in epidemiological studies. In Dorfman's context of detecting syphilis, group testing entails pooling blood samples and testing the pools, as opposed to testing individual samples. A negative pool indicates all individuals in the pool free of syphilis antigen, whereas a positive pool suggests one or more individuals carry the antigen. With covariate information collected, researchers have considered regression models that allow one to estimate covariate‐adjusted disease probability. We study maximum likelihood estimators of covariate effects in these regression models when the group testing response is prone to error. We show that, when compared with inference drawn from individual testing data, inference based on group testing data can be more resilient to response misclassification in terms of bias and efficiency. We provide valuable guidance on designing the group composition to alleviate adverse effects of misclassification on statistical inference.