Premium
Screening and treatment of obesity in school health care – the gap between clinical guidelines and reality
Author(s) -
Häkkänen Paula,
Ketola Eeva,
Laatikainen Tiina
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of caring sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.678
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1471-6712
pISSN - 0283-9318
DOI - 10.1111/scs.12578
Subject(s) - medicine , overweight , family medicine , obesity , psychological intervention , childhood obesity , health care , medline , cohort , pediatrics , nursing , political science , law , economics , economic growth
Aims School health care offers a natural setting for childhood obesity interventions. Earlier studies reveal inadequate screening and treatment in primary care. However, longitudinal studies in unselected populations are lacking. We aimed to examine how school nurses and physicians identified obesity, diagnosed it and offered interventions over primary school. We compared the results with Finnish recommendations. Methods From our cohort of 2000 primary school sixth graders (aged 12–14), 172 were obese at least once during primary school. We manually collected retrospective electronic health record ( EHR ) data of these ‘ever‐obese’ children. Results Of the ever‐obese children, 96% attended annual nurse assessments more than twice. School physicians met 53% of the ever‐obese children at health checks at first grade and 93% at fifth grade. Of overweight‐related extra visits to school nurses, 94% took place without parents. Parents were present in 48% of extra school physician visits. Only 29% of the 157 who became obese during the first five school grades received an obesity diagnosis. However, school physicians mentioned weight problems in EHR for 90% of the children and, similarly, school nurses for 99%. The majority received a treatment plan at least once. For 78%, at least one plan was made with the parents. Still, 28% missed nutrition plans, 31% exercise plans and 90% lacked recorded weight development targets. Conclusions The gap between clinical guidelines and reality in school health care could be narrowed by improving diagnosing and parent collaboration. Obstacles in parent involvement and work methods in school health care need further study.