Premium
The participant's perspective: learning from an aggression management training course for nurses. Insights from a qualitative interview study
Author(s) -
Heckemann Birgit,
Breimaier Helga Elisabeth,
Halfens Ruud J.G.,
Schols Jos M.G.A.,
Hahn Sabine
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of caring sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.678
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1471-6712
pISSN - 0283-9318
DOI - 10.1111/scs.12281
Subject(s) - aggression , visitor pattern , qualitative research , psychology , situational ethics , nursing , medical education , clinical psychology , medicine , applied psychology , social psychology , social science , sociology , computer science , programming language
Background Aggression management training for nurses is an important part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce patient and visitor aggression in healthcare. Although training is commonplace, few scientific studies examine its benefits. Aim To explore and describe, from a nurse's perspective, the learning gained from attending aggression management training. Design and methods This was a descriptive qualitative interview study. We conducted semi‐structured individual interviews with seven nurses before (September/October 2012) and after they attended aggression management training (January/February 2013). Interview transcripts were content‐analysed qualitatively. Ethical issues The study plan was reviewed by the responsible ethics committees. Participants gave written informed consent. Findings Aggression management training did not change nurses’ attitude. Coping emotionally with the management of patient and visitor aggression remained a challenge. Nurses’ theoretical knowledge increased, but they did not necessarily acquire new strategies for managing patient/visitor aggression. Instead, the course refreshed or activated existing knowledge of prevention, intervention and de‐escalation strategies. The training increased nurses' environmental and situational awareness for early signs of patient and visitor. They also acquired some strategies for emotional self‐management. Nurses became more confident in dealing with (potentially) aggressive situations. While the training influenced nurses’ individual clinical practice, learning was rarely shared within teams. Conclusions Aggression management training increases skills, knowledge and confidence in dealing with patient or visitor aggression, but the emotional management remains a challenge. Future research should investigate how aggression management training courses can strengthen nurses’ ability to emotionally cope with patient and visitor aggression. More knowledge is needed on how the theoretical and practical knowledge gained from the training may be disseminated more effectively within teams and thus contributed to the creation of low‐conflict ward cultures.