z-logo
Premium
Why Do Property‐Liability Insurers Destroy Liquidity? Evidence from South Africa
Author(s) -
Alhassan Abdul Latif,
Biekpe Nicholas
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
south african journal of economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.502
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1813-6982
pISSN - 0038-2280
DOI - 10.1111/saje.12212
Subject(s) - market liquidity , accounting liquidity , liquidity crisis , leverage (statistics) , funding liquidity , business , liquidity risk , monetary economics , liquidity premium , cash , liability , panel data , financial system , finance , economics , econometrics , machine learning , computer science
This paper examines liquidity creation behaviour in the property‐liability insurance market in South Africa. Using annual data on 76 insurers from 2007 to 2014, the paper employs the three‐stage approach to estimate liquidity creation. The results suggest that property‐liability insurers are characterised by liquidity destruction by transforming liquid assets in cash and investable securities into illiquid reserves liabilities. The findings also indicate that the R1.32 billion in liquid assets were transformed into illiquid reserves liabilities in 2014, an increase from the R700 million liquidity de‐created in 2007. The increases were mainly driven by large insurers which accounted for about 70% liquidity de‐created. The results of panel regression analysis provide evidence in support of the “risk‐absorption” hypothesis which argues that high levels of capital increases liquidity creation. In addition, size, leverage and reinsurance were also identified as the firm‐level factors that explain liquidity creation. The policy implications of the findings are discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here