Premium
On the Front Lines of Implementing Environmental Regulation: The Perspective of the Regulated Community in Montana
Author(s) -
Rinfret Sara,
Pautz Michelle C.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
review of policy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1541-1338
pISSN - 1541-132X
DOI - 10.1111/ropr.12290
Subject(s) - viewpoints , enforcement , environmental regulation , perspective (graphical) , public relations , adversarial system , perception , compliance (psychology) , state (computer science) , political science , exploratory research , public administration , business , sociology , public economics , social psychology , psychology , economics , law , art , algorithm , artificial intelligence , neuroscience , computer science , anthropology , visual arts
Although discussions about environmental policy often focus on the federal level of decision making and action in the United States, implementation occurs predominately at the state level. The individuals largely responsible for implementation are the state regulators and members of the regulated community as they constitute the front lines in environmental regulation. Much of the existing research on regulatory interactions investigates the regulatory enforcement styles of regulators and the compliance motivations of firms. It is equally important to consider the perceptions and actual experiences of regulated community members. To examine this perspective, this exploratory study utilizes a mail survey to investigate the perceptions and experiences of members of the regulated community in Montana. The survey respondents report positive and cooperative interactions with environmental regulators. This survey provides much‐needed insight into the perspectives of some members of the regulated community, challenging traditional viewpoints that the regulated community is hostile toward regulation, and promotes adversarial relationships with regulators. Accordingly, this research encourages debate about the fundamental assumptions surrounding the interactions of regulators and the regulated community in U.S. environmental policy.