Premium
The Current Status and Future Direction of Nanotechnology Regulations: A View from Nano‐scientists
Author(s) -
Corley Elizabeth A.,
Kim Youngjae,
Scheufele Dietram A.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
review of policy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1541-1338
pISSN - 1541-132X
DOI - 10.1111/ropr.12036
Subject(s) - perception , politics , political science , ideology , control (management) , discipline , public relations , engineering ethics , nanotechnology , engineering , psychology , management , law , economics , materials science , neuroscience
This article presents an up‐to‐date view of leading U . S . nanoscientists' perceptions about the regulation of nanotechnology. Our analysis draws from the results of a 2011 mail survey with 444 of the most prolific nanoscientists in the U nited S tates to explore their perceptions about existing nanotech policies, the development of new nanotech policies, and mandatory policies about the implementation of safe lab practices for federally funded nanoresearch. In addition to exploring the scientists' perceptions about these pressing policy issues, we also test relationships between their perceptions about regulation and control variables such as gender, disciplinary affiliation, and political ideology. Last, the results of the 2011 data collection are compared with a similar mail survey that was conducted in 2007 with leading U . S . nanoscientists to explore any changes over the four‐year time period in scientists' perceptions about nanotechnology policy making, and governmental involvement in nanotechnology research.