z-logo
Premium
Does a Regional Trade Agreement Lessen or Worsen Growth Volatility? An Empirical Investigation
Author(s) -
Kpodar Kangni,
Imam Patrick
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
review of international economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.513
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1467-9396
pISSN - 0965-7576
DOI - 10.1111/roie.12243
Subject(s) - economics , openness to experience , volatility (finance) , international economics , credibility , regional trade , monetary economics , empirical evidence , macroeconomics , free trade , econometrics , psychology , social psychology , philosophy , epistemology , political science , law
This paper assesses how regional trade agreements (RTAs) impact on growth volatility for a sample of 170 countries over the period 1978–2012. Notwithstanding concerns that trade openness through RTAs might heighten exposure to shocks, RTAs through enhanced policy credibility, improved policy coordination and reduced risk of conflicts can also ease growth volatility. Empirical estimations suggest the benefits outweigh the costs as RTAs are consistently associated with lower growth volatility. In addition, smaller economies benefit more from the reduced growth volatility associated with RTAs than larger ones. The nature of the RTA also matters as shallow agreements such as partial‐scope preferential trade agreements do not appear to have a significant effect on growth volatility, whereas free trade areas and customs unions do. Finally, in investigating the drivers of RTAs, the regression results confirm that countries that are more prone to shocks are more likely to join an RTA, in particular with countries with relatively less volatile growth.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here