z-logo
Premium
Ideological influences on governance and regulation: The comparative case of supreme courts
Author(s) -
Weinshall Keren,
Sommer Udi,
Ritov Ya'acov
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
regulation and governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.417
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1748-5991
pISSN - 1748-5983
DOI - 10.1111/rego.12145
Subject(s) - ideology , supreme court , deference , corporate governance , politics , preference , law , political science , ideal (ethics) , legitimacy , separation of powers , government (linguistics) , law and economics , sociology , economics , microeconomics , linguistics , philosophy , finance
A key influence on governance and regulation is the ideology of individual decisionmakers. However, certain branches of government – such as courts – while wielding wide ranging regulatory powers, are expected to do so with no attitudinal influence. We posit a dynamic response model to investigate attitudinal behavior in different national courts. Our ideological scores are estimated based on probability models that formalize the assumption that judicial decisions consist of ideological, strategic, and jurisprudential components. The Dynamic Comparative Attitudinal Measure estimates the attitudinal decisionmaking on the institution as a whole. Additionally, we estimate Ideological Ideal Point Preference for individual justices. Empirical results with original data for political and religious rights rulings in the Supreme Courts of the United States, Canada, India, the Philippines, and Israel corroborate the measures' validity. Future studies can utilize Ideological Ideal Point Preference and the Dynamic Comparative Attitudinal Measure to cover additional courts, legal spheres, and time frames, and to estimate government deference.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here