Premium
David Aven v Costa Rica : A step forward towards investor accountability for environmental harm?
Author(s) -
TamayoÁlvarez Rafael
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
review of european, comparative and international environmental law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 2050-0394
pISSN - 2050-0386
DOI - 10.1111/reel.12300
Subject(s) - compromise , harm , tribunal , arbitration , misconduct , accountability , treaty , business , political science , law , law and economics , economics
Investment treaty arbitration has become a laboratory for testing the limits of international corporate responsibility, because arbitrators are often asked to consider instances of investors’ misconduct that compromise fundamental social values and interests. The decision in David Aven v Costa Rica is a glaring example of this case law. The dispute originated from a real estate project halted by local authorities for adversely impacting fragile ecosystems. This case note examines the arbitral tribunal’s approach to environmental harm caused by foreign investors.