Premium
Role of a naturally varying flow regime in Everglades restoration
Author(s) -
Harvey Jud W.,
Wetzel Paul R.,
Lodge Thomas E.,
Engel Victor C.,
Ross Michael S.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
restoration ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1526-100X
pISSN - 1061-2971
DOI - 10.1111/rec.12558
Subject(s) - environmental science , ridge , vegetation (pathology) , hydrology (agriculture) , restoration ecology , ecosystem , floodplain , alternative stable state , wetland , water flow , flow (mathematics) , ecology , geology , soil science , biology , medicine , paleontology , geotechnical engineering , pathology , geometry , mathematics
Abstract The Everglades is a low‐gradient floodplain predominantly on organic soil that undergoes seasonally pulsing sheetflow through a network of deepwater sloughs separated by slightly higher elevation ridges. The seasonally pulsing flow permitted the coexistence of ridge and slough vegetation, including the persistence of productive, well‐connected sloughs that seasonally concentrated prey and supported wading bird nesting success. Here we review factors contributing to the origin and to degradation of the ridge and slough ecosystem in an attempt to answer “How much flow is needed to restore functionality”? A key restoration objective is to increase sheetflow lost during the past century to reestablish interactions between flow, water depth, vegetation production and decomposition, and transport of flocculent organic sediment that build and maintain ridge and slough distinctions. Our review finds broad agreement that perturbations of water level depth and its fluctuations were primary in the degradation of landscape functions, with critical contributions from perturbed water quality, and flow velocity and direction. Whereas water levels are expected to be improved on average across a range of restoration scenarios that replace between 79 and 91% of predrainage flows, the diminished microtopography substantially decreases the probability of timely improvements in some areas whereas others that retain microtopographic differences are poised for restoration benefits. New advances in predicting restoration outcomes are coming from biophysical modeling of ridge–slough dynamics, system‐wide measurements of landscape functionality, and large‐scale flow restoration experiments, including active management techniques to kick‐start slough regeneration.