z-logo
Premium
Debunking leftward progress
Author(s) -
Huemer Michael
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ratio
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1467-9329
pISSN - 0034-0006
DOI - 10.1111/rati.12223
Subject(s) - redistribution (election) , positive economics , epistemology , correctness , political science , social psychology , sociology , law and economics , psychology , political economy , law , philosophy , economics , politics , computer science , programming language
In earlier work, I argued that observed changes in moral values over human history are best explained as cognitive progress: societies tend over the long term to move closer to the objective moral truth. It is also true that, in recent decades, liberal democracies have moved strongly in the direction of greater government regulation and wealth redistribution. Does this mean that extensive regulation and redistribution are objectively good? I argue that the answer is no; these recent trends are importantly different from earlier examples of moral progress in ways that enable them to be satisfyingly explained without adverting to objective moral correctness.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here