z-logo
Premium
The Possibility of a Fair Play Account of Legitimacy
Author(s) -
Tosi Justin
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ratio
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1467-9329
pISSN - 0034-0006
DOI - 10.1111/rati.12114
Subject(s) - obedience , stipulation , legitimacy , power (physics) , law and economics , state (computer science) , epistemology , law , sociology , political science , philosophy , computer science , politics , physics , algorithm , quantum mechanics
The philosophical literature on state legitimacy has recently seen a significant conceptual revision. Several philosophers have argued that the state's right to rule is better characterized not as a claim right to obedience, but as a power right. There have been few attempts to show that traditional justifications for the claim right might also be used to justify a power right, and there have been no such attempts involving the principle of fair play, which is widely regarded as the most promising basis for a claim right to obedience. William Edmundson argues that the principle of fair play cannot generate power rights, and so any attempt at a fair play account of legitimacy must fail. I explain how fair play could generate a power right, owing to its stipulation that the rules of a cooperative scheme specify the form of participants' repayment.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here