z-logo
Premium
The Nature of Law and Potential Coercion
Author(s) -
WoodburySmith Kara
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ratio juris
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.344
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1467-9337
pISSN - 0952-1917
DOI - 10.1111/raju.12288
Subject(s) - coercion (linguistics) , morality , appeal , law , enforcement , political science , compliance (psychology) , law enforcement , law and economics , sociology , psychology , philosophy , social psychology , linguistics
This paper argues for a novel understanding of the relationship between law and coercion. It firstly refutes Kenneth Himma’s claim that the authorisation of coercive enforcement mechanisms is a conceptually necessary feature of law. It then claims that the best way to understand the law is as coercion‐apt. The “coercion‐aptness” of law is clarified, in part, by appealing to an essential distinction between law and morality: Whereas it can be reasonable for the law to appeal to coercive means in order to motivate compliance, it seems decidedly unreasonable for morality to do so.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here