z-logo
Premium
Global Luck Egalitarianism and Border Control
Author(s) -
Angell Kim,
Huseby Robert
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ratio juris
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.344
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1467-9337
pISSN - 0952-1917
DOI - 10.1111/raju.12236
Subject(s) - egalitarianism , skepticism , luck , control (management) , positive economics , law and economics , closing (real estate) , political science , inequality , sociology , economics , epistemology , law , philosophy , politics , management , mathematical analysis , mathematics
This paper discusses what implications global luck egalitarianism (GLE) has for border control. Some authors suggest that an open‐borders policy follows from GLE. The idea is that various unchosen inequalities inevitably follow from differences in birthplace, such that GLE will always have principled reason to condemn closed borders. Others are skeptical of the assumption that GLE will have liberal implications for border control, because open borders may have other, adverse effects that outweigh the reductions in unjust inequality. Against such skeptics, we argue that GLE will (typically) have quite liberal implications for border control. However, this connection is not a principled one: Whether (and to what extent) GLE favors opening or closing borders will depend upon empirical circumstances.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here