Premium
Group Vulnerability, Asymmetrical Balance, and Multicultural Recognition
Author(s) -
Macioce Fabio
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ratio juris
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.344
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1467-9337
pISSN - 0952-1917
DOI - 10.1111/raju.12228
Subject(s) - multiculturalism , vulnerability (computing) , balance (ability) , politics , order (exchange) , law and economics , political science , sociology , work (physics) , epistemology , social psychology , law , public relations , psychology , computer science , business , computer security , engineering , philosophy , mechanical engineering , finance , neuroscience
In this paper I argue for a cautious multicultural approach, with specific regard to its implementation as a legal strategy. Such an approach is cautious only because, as I will demonstrate, it stems from an awareness that in some cases, and for different reasons (political, social, as well as legal), other multicultural policies based on minority or group rights do not work. In other words, I will argue for a strategy of recognition that is additional to others, and that can be implemented and juxtaposed with others, in order to offer a better defence of those rights and claims, which other policies do not recognise (or recognise insufficiently).