z-logo
Premium
Comparing Cost Accounting Use across European Countries: The Role of Administrative Traditions, NPM Instruments, and Fiscal Stress
Author(s) -
Mohr Zachary T.,
Raudla Ringa,
Douglas James W.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
public administration review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.721
H-Index - 139
eISSN - 1540-6210
pISSN - 0033-3352
DOI - 10.1111/puar.13162
Subject(s) - accounting , cost accounting , management accounting , government (linguistics) , national accounts , project accounting , accounting information system , public economics , new public management , business , economics , positive accounting , public sector , financial accounting , economy , linguistics , philosophy
Cost accounting in public organizations is not often studied from a comparative perspective , particularly at the national level of government . While it is often claimed that factors such as New Public Management (NPM) and fiscal stress are the primary drivers of government cost accounting , an important but understudied factor is the administrative tradition of the government , which may influence the use of cost accounting and tools like it . This article examines the perceptions of top public executives regarding cost accounting use across 19 European countries . It focuses on three key factors identified in the literature as potentially being associated with cost accounting use—administrative traditions , NPM instruments , and fiscal stress . Findings show that administrative tradition and the use of NPM instruments are related to cost accounting use , but fiscal stress is not related to cost accounting use in the countries in our study .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom