z-logo
Premium
Association between neural reactivity and startle reactivity to uncertain threat in two independent samples
Author(s) -
Gorka Stephanie M.,
Lieberman Lynne,
Shankman Stewart A.,
Phan K. Luan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
psychophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.661
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1469-8986
pISSN - 0048-5772
DOI - 10.1111/psyp.12829
Subject(s) - psychology , startle response , moro reflex , anticipation (artificial intelligence) , neuroscience , anxiety , orbitofrontal cortex , cognitive psychology , audiology , cognition , prefrontal cortex , reflex , artificial intelligence , psychiatry , computer science , medicine
Prior studies indicate that anxiety disorders are associated with heightened sensitivity to uncertain threat (U threat). Individual differences in reactivity to U threat have been measured in the laboratory with two methodologies—startle eyeblink potentiation and fMRI. While startle and fMRI are purported to relate to each other, very little research exists on whether individual differences in one measure are associated with individual differences in another and, thus, whether startle and fMRI capture shared mechanisms. Therefore, the current study was designed to investigate if and where in the brain measures of startle potentiation and fMRI BOLD signal correlate during response to U threat across two independent samples. Participants in both studies completed two threat anticipation tasks—once during collection of startle potentiation and once during fMRI. In Study 1 ( n  = 43), the startle and fMRI tasks both used electric shock as the threat. As an extension, in Study 2 ( n  = 38), the startle task used electric shock but the fMRI task used aversive images. Despite these methodological differences, greater startle potentiation to U threat was associated with greater dorsal anterior cingulate, caudate, and orbitofrontal cortex reactivity to U threat in both samples. The findings suggest that startle and fMRI measures of responding to U threat overlap, and points toward an integrated brain‐behavior profile of aberrant U threat responding.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here