Premium
Does response selection contribute to inhibition of return?
Author(s) -
Wascher Edmund,
Schneider Daniel,
Hoffmann Sven
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
psychophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.661
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1469-8986
pISSN - 0048-5772
DOI - 10.1111/psyp.12420
Subject(s) - inhibition of return , cued speech , psychology , cognitive psychology , response inhibition , neuroscience , selection (genetic algorithm) , selective attention , mechanism (biology) , audiology , developmental psychology , visual attention , perception , cognition , medicine , philosophy , epistemology , artificial intelligence , computer science
Inhibition of return (IOR) means delayed responses for targets at a cued compared to targets at an uncued location. It is assumed to reflect delayed reallocation of attention toward a previously attended location. Besides an attentional mechanism, IOR could also be due to a cue‐evoked inhibition to respond toward a cued target. In the present study, IOR with simple, compatible, and incompatible choice responses was compared and tracked by means of event‐related EEG activity. IOR was amplified with simple responses but did not differ between compatible and incompatible responses. Attention‐related ERP correlates were constant across cue target onset asynchronies as were, in part, behavioral effects. Early, rather sensory ERP components varied with time, reflecting sensory or attentional interaction of cue and target processing. None of these effects varied with response requirements, indicating that response selection does not contribute to IOR in manual choice response tasks.