z-logo
Premium
Electrophysiological dynamics reveal distinct processing of stimulus‐stimulus and stimulus‐response conflicts
Author(s) -
Li Qi,
Wang Kai,
Nan Weizhi,
Zheng Ya,
Wu Haiyan,
Wang Hongbin,
Liu Xun
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
psychophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.661
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1469-8986
pISSN - 0048-5772
DOI - 10.1111/psyp.12382
Subject(s) - stimulus (psychology) , psychology , stimulus–response compatibility , electrophysiology , neuroscience , cognition , simon effect , cognitive psychology , communication , audiology , medicine
The present study examined electroencephalogram profiles on a novel stimulus‐response compatibility ( SRC ) task in order to elucidate the distinct brain mechanisms of stimulus‐stimulus ( S ‐ S ) and stimulus‐response ( S ‐ R ) conflict processing. The results showed that the SRC effects on reaction times ( RT s) and N 2 amplitudes were additive when both S ‐ S and S ‐ R conflicts existed. We also observed that, for both RT s and N 2 amplitudes, the conflict adaptation effects—the reduced SRC effect following an incongruent trial versus a congruent trial—were present only when two consecutive trials involved the same type of conflict. Time‐frequency analysis revealed that both S ‐ S and S ‐ R conflicts modulated power in the theta band, whereas S ‐ S conflict additionally modulated power in the alpha and beta bands. In summary, our findings provide insight into the domain‐specific conflict processing and the modular organization of cognitive control.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here