Premium
Comparison of the decreases in regional cerebral blood flow in the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and parietal lobe between suspected non‐Alzheimer 's disease pathophysiology and Alzheimer's disease
Author(s) -
Hayashi Hiroshi,
Kobayashi Ryota,
Kawakatsu Shinobu,
Ohba Makoto,
Morioka Daichi,
Otani Koichi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
psychogeriatrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.647
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1479-8301
pISSN - 1346-3500
DOI - 10.1111/psyg.12729
Subject(s) - precuneus , posterior cingulate , dementia , receiver operating characteristic , cerebral blood flow , alzheimer's disease , pathophysiology , medicine , posterior parietal cortex , temporal lobe , parietal lobe , area under the curve , cardiology , neurodegeneration , cortex (anatomy) , snap , disease , neuroscience , psychology , radiology , functional magnetic resonance imaging , epilepsy , computer graphics (images) , computer science
Background Suspected non‐Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology (SNAP) shows Alzheimer's disease (AD)‐like neurodegeneration; however, amyloid β, which is a biological marker in AD, remains within normal levels. Since the effectiveness of anti‐dementia drugs for AD on SNAP is unknown, it is important to distinguish between patients with SNAP and AD. We aimed to compare decreases in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), precuneus, and parietal lobe critical to AD between SNAP and AD groups using the easy Z‐score imaging system in single‐photon emission computed tomography (eZIS‐SPECT). Methods We retrospectively analysed eZIS‐SPECT data of 13 SNAP and 24 AD patients. The three indicators (severity, extent, and ratio) that distinguished AD patients from healthy controls in previous studies were automatically calculated and were compared between the SNAP and AD groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the three indicators of eZIS in discriminating between the two groups. Results The mean values of severity, extent, and ratio were significantly lower in the SNAP group than in the AD group ( P = 0.024, P = 0.044, and P = 0.045, respectively). The AUC values for severity, extent, and ratio were 0.668, 0.683, and 0.692, respectively. Conclusions The present study suggests that SNAP shows milder reduction of rCBF in the PCC, precuneus, and parietal lobe as compared to AD. However, it may be difficult to distinguish between SNAP and AD with the degrees of decrease in rCBF in these regions.