Premium
The Electoral Roots of A merica's Dysfunctional Government
Author(s) -
Abramowitz Alan I.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
presidential studies quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.337
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 1741-5705
pISSN - 0360-4918
DOI - 10.1111/psq.12063
Subject(s) - gridlock , divided government , political science , ideology , political economy , polarization (electrochemistry) , compromise , democracy , politics , public administration , law , sociology , chemistry
Since the 2010 midterm election, a combination of ideologically polarized parties and divided government has resulted in gridlock in Washington. Neither party can implement its own policy agenda, but bipartisan compromise appears to be almost impossible to achieve. In this article, I present evidence that the deep ideological divide between the parties in W ashington is itself rooted in divisions that have been developing in A merican society for decades. D emocratic and R epublican voters are much more divided along geographic, racial, cultural, and ideological lines than in the past. Polarization in W ashington reflects polarization within the A merican electorate. The result has been gridlock in W ashington along with increasing divergence of social and economic policies at the state level with red states and blue states moving in opposing directions. I argue that the only way to end gridlock in W ashington is party democracy, which would require, at a minimum, ending the Senate filibuster but, ideally, major constitutional reforms such as eliminating midterm elections.