Premium
The Law : No Relief in Sight: Barring B ivens Claims in Torture Cases
Author(s) -
Klarevas Louis
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
presidential studies quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.337
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 1741-5705
pISSN - 0360-4918
DOI - 10.1111/psq.12029
Subject(s) - torture , law , lawsuit , political science , damages , plaintiff , conscience , human rights
Generally, the appropriate private cause of action against officials who, under color of federal law, violate someone's constitutional rights is to seek damages in a B ivens lawsuit. When national security issues are involved, however, the federal courts regularly bar relief under B ivens. As the recent appellate decisions in L ebron v. R umsfeld, P adilla v. Y oo, D oe v. R umsfeld, and V ance v. R umsfeld display, even when the rights violations involve torture and similar acts, which “shock the conscience,” there is no B ivens relief available to plaintiffs.