z-logo
Premium
The Law : No Relief in Sight: Barring B ivens Claims in Torture Cases
Author(s) -
Klarevas Louis
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
presidential studies quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.337
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 1741-5705
pISSN - 0360-4918
DOI - 10.1111/psq.12029
Subject(s) - torture , law , lawsuit , political science , damages , plaintiff , conscience , human rights
Generally, the appropriate private cause of action against officials who, under color of federal law, violate someone's constitutional rights is to seek damages in a B ivens lawsuit. When national security issues are involved, however, the federal courts regularly bar relief under B ivens. As the recent appellate decisions in L ebron v. R umsfeld, P adilla v. Y oo, D oe v. R umsfeld, and V ance v. R umsfeld display, even when the rights violations involve torture and similar acts, which “shock the conscience,” there is no B ivens relief available to plaintiffs.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom