z-logo
Premium
Optical properties of developing pip and stone fruit reveal underlying structural changes
Author(s) -
Seifert Birgit,
Zude Manuela,
Spinelli Lorenzo,
Torricelli Alessandro
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
physiologia plantarum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.351
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1399-3054
pISSN - 0031-9317
DOI - 10.1111/ppl.12232
Subject(s) - chemistry , biophysics , biology
Analyzing the optical properties of fruits represents a powerful approach for non‐destructive observations of fruit development. With classical spectroscopy in the visible and near‐infrared wavelength ranges, the apparent attenuation of light results from its absorption or scattering. In horticultural applications, frequently, the normalized difference vegetation index ( NDVI ) is employed to reduce the effects of varying scattering properties on the apparent signal. However, this simple approach appears to be limited. In the laboratory, with time‐resolved reflectance spectroscopy, the absorption coefficient, μ a , and the reduced scattering coefficient, μ s ′, can be analyzed separately. In this study, these differentiated optical properties were recorded (540–940 nm), probing fruit tissue from the skin up to 2 cm depth in apple ( Malus × domestica ‘Elstar’) and plum ( Prunus domestica ‘Tophit plus’) harvested four times (65–145 days after full bloom). The μ a spectra showed typical peak at 670 nm of the chlorophyll absorption. The μ s ′ at 670 nm in apple changed by 14.7% (18.2–15.5 cm −1 ), while in plum differences of 41.5% (8.5–5.0 cm −1 ) were found. The scattering power, the relative change of μ s ′, was zero in apple, but enhanced in plum over the fruit development period. This mirrors more isotropic and constant structures in apple compared with plum. For horticultural applications, the larger variability in scattering properties of plum explains the discrepancy between commercially assessed NDVI values or similar indices and the absolute μ a values in plum (R < 0.05), while the NDVI approach appeared reasonable in apple (R ≥ 0.80).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here