Premium
Validity and reliability of Evidence‐Based Practice Leadership Scale and Evidence‐Based Work Environment Scale in Turkish
Author(s) -
Türe Aysun,
Demirsoy Nilufer,
Yıldırım Aytolan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
perspectives in psychiatric care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.538
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1744-6163
pISSN - 0031-5990
DOI - 10.1111/ppc.12529
Subject(s) - turkish , scale (ratio) , psychology , reliability (semiconductor) , validity , confirmatory factor analysis , applied psychology , criterion validity , test (biology) , test validity , psychometrics , construct validity , clinical psychology , structural equation modeling , statistics , mathematics , paleontology , philosophy , linguistics , physics , power (physics) , quantum mechanics , biology
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Evidence‐Based Practice Leadership Scale (EBPLS) and Work Environment Scale (EBPWES) translated into Turkish so that they are used in nursing research. Design and Methods This methodological study was conducted with nurses. Language and content validity, item analyses were used to test the validity and reliability of the scales. Findings The confirmatory factor analysis results demonstrate that t values of each item in both scales are significant ( P < .05). All model and data fit indices are higher than the acceptable level. Thus, CFA has shown that the scales with model‐data fit are valid. Practice Implications The characteristics of nurse leaders and the suitability of the working environment are crucial for the maintenance of evidence‐based practices. EBPLS and EBPWES will be effective and reliable tools in our country and an effective tool for contributing to the maintenance and development of evidence‐based practices. The analyses indicate that the Turkish versions of the EBPLS and the EBPWES are acceptable, valid, and reliable for Turkish nurses.