z-logo
Premium
Reply to K enneth Thomas's “ Wild Analysis in Politics ”
Author(s) -
Crouse James,
Stalker Douglas
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
political psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.419
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1467-9221
pISSN - 0162-895X
DOI - 10.1111/pops.12089
Subject(s) - authoritarianism , psychodynamics , politics , psychology , social psychology , psychoanalysis , sociology , criminology , law , political science , democracy
We try to clarify K enneth T homas's (“ W ild A nalysis in P olitics”) mistakes about our analysis of the question: Do right‐wing authoritarian ( RWA ) beliefs originate from psychological conflict? We suggest, contrary to T homas's analysis, an approach that builds on the kinds of psychodynamic causes we use to explain RWA and the importance of confirming them empirically.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here