Premium
Physiological aspects of raffinose family oligosaccharides in plants: protection against abiotic stress
Author(s) -
ElSayed A. I.,
Rafudeen M. S.,
Golldack D.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
plant biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.871
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1438-8677
pISSN - 1435-8603
DOI - 10.1111/plb.12053
Subject(s) - raffinose , biology , abiotic stress , abiotic component , botany , sucrose , biochemistry , ecology , gene
Abiotic stresses resulting from water deficit, high salinity or periods of drought adversely affect plant growth and development and represent major selective forces during plant evolution. The raffinose family oligosaccharides ( RFO s) are synthesised from sucrose by the subsequent addition of activated galactinol moieties donated by galactinol. RFO s are characterised as compatible solutes involved in stress tolerance defence mechanisms, although evidence also suggests that they act as antioxidants, are part of carbon partitioning strategies and may serve as signals in response to stress. The key enzyme and regulatory point in RFO biosynthesis is galactinol synthase (GolS), and an increase of GolS in expression and activity is often associated with abiotic stress. It has also been shown that different GolS isoforms are expressed in response to different types of abiotic stress, suggesting that the timing and accumulation of RFO s are controlled for each abiotic stress. However, the accumulation of RFO s in response to stress is not universal and other functional roles have been suggested for RFO s, such as being part of a carbon storage mechanism. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants with increased galactinol and raffinose concentrations had better ROS scavenging capacity, while many sugars have been shown in vitro to have antioxidant activity, suggesting that RFO s may also act as antioxidants. The RFO pathway also interacts with other carbohydrate pathways, such as that of O ‐methyl inositol ( OMI ), which shows that the functional relevance of RFO s must not be seen in isolation to overall carbon re‐allocation during stress responses.