z-logo
Premium
Impossible Odds
Author(s) -
SalmÓn Nathan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
philosophy and phenomenological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1933-1592
pISSN - 0031-8205
DOI - 10.1111/phpr.12517
Subject(s) - metaphysics , epistemology , philosophy , odds , counterexample , outcome (game theory) , modality (human–computer interaction) , mathematical economics , mathematics , computer science , artificial intelligence , discrete mathematics , statistics , logistic regression
A thesis (“weak BCP ”) nearly universally held among philosophers of probability connects the concepts of objective chance and metaphysical modality: Any prospect (outcome) that has a positive chance of obtaining is metaphysically possible—(nearly) equivalently, any metaphysically impossible prospect has zero chance. Particular counterexamples are provided utilizing the monotonicity of chance, one of them related to the four world paradox . Explanations are offered for the persistent feeling that there cannot be chancy metaphysical necessities or chancy metaphysical impossibilities. Chance is objective but contrary to popular opinion it is also largely epistemic. Chancy necessities are analogous to necessary a posteriori truths.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here