Premium
Upward Grounding[Note 1. Many thanks to Michael Bertrand, Christopher Buckels, David Copp, ...]
Author(s) -
Dixon T. Scott
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
philosophy and phenomenological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1933-1592
pISSN - 0031-8205
DOI - 10.1111/phpr.12366
Subject(s) - problem of universals , proposition , philosophy , epistemology , face (sociological concept) , nominalism , existential quantification , linguistics
Realists about universals face a question about grounding. Are things how they are because they instantiate the universals they do? Or do they instantiate those universals because they are how they are? Take Ebenezer Scrooge. You can say that (i) Scrooge is greedy because he instantiates greediness, or you can say that (ii) Scrooge instantiates greediness because he is greedy. I argue that there is reason to prefer the latter to the former. I develop two arguments for the view. I also respond to some concerns one might have about the view defended. I close by showing that analogous views regarding the truth of propositions (that if the proposition that p is true, then it is true because p ) and the existence of facts (that if the fact that p exists, then it exists because p ) are supported by analogs of one of these arguments.