z-logo
Premium
Practical Certainty
Author(s) -
Locke Dustin
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
philosophy and phenomenological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1933-1592
pISSN - 0031-8205
DOI - 10.1111/phpr.12036
Subject(s) - certainty , deliberation , epistemology , probabilistic logic , philosophy , psychology , political science , law , politics
When we engage in practical deliberation, we sometimes engage in careful probabilistic reasoning. At other times, we simply make flat out assumptions about how the world is or will be. A question thus arises: when, if ever, is it rationally permissible to engage in the latter, less sophisticated kind of practical deliberation? Recently, a number of authors have argued that the answer concerns whether one knows that p . Others have argued that the answer concerns whether one is justified in believing that one knows that p . Against both of these, this paper argues that the answer concerns whether p is ‘practically certain’—that is, whether the actual epistemic probability that p differs from epistemic certainty that p only in ways that are irrelevant to the decision one currently faces.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here