Premium
Photopatch testing in A sians: a 5‐year experience in S ingapore
Author(s) -
Chuah Sai Yee,
Leow Yung Hian,
Goon Anthony Teik Jin,
Theng Colin Thiam Seng,
Chong WeiSheng
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
photodermatology, photoimmunology and photomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.736
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1600-0781
pISSN - 0905-4383
DOI - 10.1111/phpp.12034
Subject(s) - dermatology , medicine
Summary Background Photopatch testing is important for diagnosing photoallergic contact dermatitis. We aimed to evaluate the use of photopatch test at the N ational S kin C entre, S ingapore. Methods All patients who had photopatch tests done between 2007 and 2011 at the N ational S kin C entre were included. Results Twenty‐two patients were included. The mean age was 40.2. Female : male ratio was 3.4. The ethnic groups were C hinese (68%), M alay (4%), I ndian (14%) and others (14%). Ten out of 22 patients (45.5%) had a positive photopatch test. There were 20 positive photopatch test reactions found in these 10 patients, and all 20 positive reactions were of current relevance. The frequencies of the positive photopatch test reactions were 2‐hydroxy‐4‐methoxybenzophenone (oxybenzone) ( n = 6), 2‐hydroxymethoxymethylbenzophenone (mexenone) ( n = 3), 2‐ethylhexyl‐4‐dimethylaminobenzoate ( n = 1), ketoprofen gel ( n = 1) and the patient's own product ( n = 9). Conclusions Our study suggests that sunscreen is the most common photoallergen to date as opposed to musk ambrette, which was the most common photoallergen in our earlier study in 1991–1993. This finding is similar to the recent E uropean M ulticentre P hotopatch T est S tudy.