Premium
Feasibility of describing community strengths relative to Omaha system concepts
Author(s) -
Kerr Madeleine J.,
GargantuaAguila Sebastiana del Rosario,
Glavin Kari,
Honey Michelle L. L.,
Nahcivan Nursen O.,
Secginli Selda,
Martin Karen S.,
Monsen Karen A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
public health nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.471
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1525-1446
pISSN - 0737-1209
DOI - 10.1111/phn.12558
Subject(s) - strengths and weaknesses , checklist , residence , psychology , sample (material) , applied psychology , gerontology , nursing , medical education , medicine , social psychology , sociology , chemistry , demography , chromatography , cognitive psychology
Objectives The purpose was to determine the feasibility of using a standardized language, the Omaha System, to describe community‐level strengths. The objectives were: (a) to evaluate the feasibility of using the Omaha System at the community level to reflect community strengths and (b) to describe preliminary results of community strengths observations across international settings. Design and Sample A descriptive qualitative design was used. The sample was a data set of 284 windshield surveys by nursing students in 5 countries: Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Turkey, and the United States. Measures An online survey included a checklist and open‐ended questions on community strengths for 11 concepts of the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme: Income, Sanitation, Residence, Neighborhood/workplace safety, Communication with community resources, Social contact, Interpersonal relationship, Spirituality, Nutrition, Substance use, and Health care supervision. Themes were derived through content analysis of responses to the open‐ended questions. Results Feasibility was demonstrated: Students were able to use the Omaha System terms and collect data on strengths. Common themes were described among the five countries. Conclusions The Omaha System appears to be useful in documenting community‐level strengths. Themes and exemplar quotes provide a first step in developing operational definitions of strengths at a more granular level.