z-logo
Premium
On the Differences Between Rush Rhees and Simone Weil
Author(s) -
Mounce H.O.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
philosophical investigations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.172
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 1467-9205
pISSN - 0190-0536
DOI - 10.1111/phin.12260
Subject(s) - relation (database) , sign (mathematics) , epistemology , philosophy , power (physics) , extension (predicate logic) , reflexive pronoun , religious belief , computer science , mathematics , mathematical analysis , physics , quantum mechanics , database , programming language
Rhees seems unaware that Simone Weil differed from him both in her conception of philosophy and of its relation to religion. She differed also in her view of the relation between religion and science. On her view, the aim of science is to find the laws which will allow us to apply deductive reasoning to nature. The necessities revealed had for her a religious significance. But this can be understood only given her view of the relation between God and the world. On her view, the creation of the world did not involve an extension of God's power. It involved a withdrawal of his power, so that there could be an existence independent of himself. God does not interfere in the details of the world but sustains it through a network of necessities. For this reason, these necessities can serve as a sign of God.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here