Premium
Alternative methods for virtual heart transplant—Size matching for pediatric heart transplantation with and without donor medical images available
Author(s) -
Plasencia Jonathan D.,
Kamarianakis Yiannis,
Ryan Justin R.,
Karamlou Tara,
Park Susan S.,
Nigro John J.,
Frakes David. H.,
Pophal Stephen G.,
Lagerstrom Carl F.,
Velez Daniel A.,
Zangwill Steven D.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
pediatric transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.457
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1399-3046
pISSN - 1397-3142
DOI - 10.1111/petr.13290
Subject(s) - medicine , percentile , matching (statistics) , virtual patient , transplantation , sample size determination , surgery , statistics , pathology , mathematics , medical education
Background Listed pediatric heart transplant patients have the highest solid‐organ waitlist mortality rate. The donor‐recipient body weight ( DRBW ) ratio is the clinical standard for allograft size matching but may unnecessarily limit a patient's donor pool. To overcome DRBW ratio limitations, two methods of performing virtual heart transplant fit assessments were developed that account for patient‐specific nuances. Method 1 uses an allograft total cardiac volume ( TCV ) prediction model informed by patient data wherein a matched allograft 3‐D reconstruction is selected from a virtual library for assessment. Method 2 uses donor images for a direct virtual transplant assessment. Methods Assessments were performed in medical image reconstruction software. The allograft model was developed using allometric/isometric scaling assumptions and cross‐validation. Results The final predictive model included gender, height, and weight. The 25th‐, 50th‐, and 75th‐percentiles for TCV percentage errors were −13% (over‐prediction), −1%, and 8% (under‐prediction), respectively. Two examples illustrating the potential of virtual assessments are presented. Conclusion Transplant centers can apply these methods to perform their virtual assessments using existing technology. These techniques have potential to improve organ allocation. With additional experience and refinement, virtual transplants may become standard of care for determining suitability of donor organ size for an identified recipient.