Premium
Does attachment style moderate the effect of computer‐mediated versus face‐to‐face conflict discussions?
Author(s) -
Pollmann Monique M. H.,
Crockett Erin E.,
Vanden Abeele Mariek M. P.,
Schouten Alexander P.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
personal relationships
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.81
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1475-6811
pISSN - 1350-4126
DOI - 10.1111/pere.12345
Subject(s) - psychology , anger , conflict resolution , style (visual arts) , attachment theory , face to face , romance , face (sociological concept) , distress , social psychology , computer mediated communication , psychotherapist , psychoanalysis , the internet , computer science , sociology , social science , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology , world wide web , history
Successful conflict resolution is important in romantic relationships. With the advent of computer‐mediated communication (CMC), partners can resolve conflict using CMC. But is CMC as effective as face‐to‐face communication for conflict resolution? And does the effectiveness depend on attachment style? We asked 100 romantic couples to discuss a conflict topic and randomly assigned them to do so face‐to‐face or via CMC. Levels of distress, anger, and conflict resolution did not differ between face‐to‐face and CMC discussions. Attachment style did not moderate these findings. A more anxious and a more avoidant attachment style were associated with higher levels of distress and anger. We conclude that there is no indication that resolving conflict face‐to‐face has advantages over resolving conflict via CMC.