Premium
Measuring what counts: Development of a new four‐category measure of adult attachment
Author(s) -
SCHARFE ELAINE
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
personal relationships
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.81
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1475-6811
pISSN - 1350-4126
DOI - 10.1111/pere.12105
Subject(s) - psychology , paragraph , internal consistency , measure (data warehouse) , reliability (semiconductor) , construct validity , interpretation (philosophy) , social psychology , consistency (knowledge bases) , developmental psychology , psychometrics , artificial intelligence , computer science , data mining , physics , power (physics) , world wide web , programming language , quantum mechanics
Measurement issues have plagued attachment research over the past 30 years. Concerns range from limitations of the original paragraph measure (C. Hazan & P. R. Shaver, 1987), low reliability of continuous scales of Bartholomew's 4‐category measure, limited interpretation of the 2 dimensions of the Experience of Close Relationships and the Experience of Close Relationships‐Revised ( ECR / ECR ‐R; K. A. Brennan, C. L. Clark, & P. R. Shaver, 1998; R. C. Fraley, N. G. Waller, & K. A. Brennan, 2000), and time‐consuming coding of attachment interviews. In this article, a revision of the Relationship Scales Questionnaire ( RSQ ) is introduced. The new 4‐category scales were found to have improved internal consistency when compared with the original RSQ scales as well as moderate to high test–retest reliability and good construct validity, thereby providing an alternative measure for researchers who are interested in assessing the effects of the 4‐category model of attachment.