z-logo
Premium
Outcomes of using flash glucose monitoring technology by children and young people with type 1 diabetes in a single arm study
Author(s) -
Campbell Fiona M.,
Murphy Nuala P.,
Stewart Caroline,
Biester Torben,
Kordonouri Olga
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
pediatric diabetes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.678
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1399-5448
pISSN - 1399-543X
DOI - 10.1111/pedi.12735
Subject(s) - medicine , hypoglycemia , diabetes mellitus , type 1 diabetes , type 2 diabetes , diabetes management , blood glucose self monitoring , glycemic , dosing , prospective cohort study , insulin , continuous glucose monitoring , pediatrics , endocrinology
Background and Objective Outcomes of using flash glucose monitoring have been reported in adults. This trial evaluated use in children and teenagers with type 1 diabetes. Methods Prospective, single arm, non‐inferiority multicenter study to demonstrate equivalence of time in range (TIR [70‐180 mg/dL]) by comparing 14‐day masked sensor wear (baseline) with self‐monitored blood glucose (SMBG) testing to the final 14‐days of 8‐week open‐label system use for diabetes self‐management including insulin dosing. Results A total of 76 children and teenagers (46.1% male; age 10.3 ± 4.0 years, type 1 diabetes duration 5.4 ± 3.7 years; mean ± SD) from 10 sites participated. TIR improved significantly by 0.9 ± 2.8 h/d ( P = 0.005) vs SMBG baseline. Time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) reduced by −1.2 ± 3.3 h/d ( P = 0.004). HbA1c reduced by −0.4% (−4.4 mmol/mol), from 7.9 ± 1.0% (62.9 ± 11.2 mmol/mol) baseline to 7.5 ± 0.9% (58.5 ± 9.8 mmol/mol) study end ( P < 0.0001) with reductions across all age‐subgroups (4‐6, 7‐12 and 13‐17 years). Time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was unaffected. Throughout the treatment phase system utilization was 91% ± 9; sensor scanning was 12.9 ± 5.7/d with SMBG dropping to 1.6 ± 1.9 from 7.7 ± 2.5/d. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire “Total Treatment Satisfaction” score improved for parents ( P < 0.0001) and teenagers ( P < 0.0001). No adverse events ( n = 121) were associated with sensor accuracy, 42 participants experienced sensor insertion signs and symptoms. Three participants experienced three mild device‐related (sensor wear) symptoms, resolving quickly (without treatment [ n = 2], non‐prescription antihistamines [ n = 1]). Conclusions Children with diabetes improved glycemic control safely and effectively with short‐term flash glucose monitoring compared to use of SMBG in a single arm study.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom