Premium
Sulfonylurea challenge test in subjects diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Author(s) -
Remedi Maria S.,
Thomas Mareen,
Nichols Colin G.,
Marshall Bess A.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
pediatric diabetes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.678
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1399-5448
pISSN - 1399-543X
DOI - 10.1111/pedi.12489
Subject(s) - glipizide , medicine , sulfonylurea , type 1 diabetes , diabetes mellitus , insulin , endocrinology , type 2 diabetes mellitus
Background: Patients with early onset diabetes because of defects in glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion ( GSIS ) may respond better to sulfonylureas than insulin treatment. Such patients include those with monogenic disorders, who can be differentiated from autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus ( T1DM ) by genetic testing. Genetic testing is expensive and unknown defects in GSIS would not be diagnosed. Aims: We propose a sulfonylurea challenge test to identify patients who have been clinically diagnosed with T1DM , but those who maintain a preferentially sulfonylurea‐responsive insulin secretion. Materials & Methods: A total of 3 healthy controls, 2 neonatal diabetes mellitus ( NDM ) subjects, 3 antibody‐positive (Ab+ T1DM ), and 12 antibody‐negative (Ab− T1DM ) subjects with type 1 diabetes, were given an intravenous bolus of glucose followed by an oral dose of glipizide. Results: Healthy controls showed a robust C‐peptide increase after both glucose and glipizide, but NDM subjects showed a large increase in C‐peptide only following glipizide. As expected, 2 of 3 Ab+ T1DM , as well as 11 of 12 Ab− T1DM showed no response to either glucose or glipizide. However, 1 Ab− T1DM and 1 Ab+ T1DM showed a small C‐peptide response to glucose and a marked positive response to glipizide, suggesting defects in GSIS rather than typical autoimmune diabetes. Discussion: These data demonstrate the feasibility of the sulfonylurea challenge test, and suggest that responder individuals may be identified. Conclusions: We propose that this sulfonylurea challenge test should be explored more extensively, as it may prove useful as a clinical and scientific tool.